
Control Chart
A control chart is a statistical tool used to distinguish between variation
in a process resulting from common causes and variation resulting from
special causes. It presents a graphic display of process stability over
time.
When should we use a control chart?
A stable process is one that is consistent over time with respect to
the center and the spread of the data. Control charts help you monitor
the behavior of your process to determine whether it is stable. Like
run charts, they display data in the time
sequence in which they occurred. However, control charts are more efficient
than run charts in assessing and achieving process stability.
Your team will benefit from using a control chart when you want to:
- monitor process variation over time;
- differentiate between special cause and common cause variation;
- assess the effectiveness of changes to improve a process; and
- communicate how a process performed during a specific period.
How do we develop a control chart?
Developing a control chart consists of four major steps:
Step 1: Determine what to measure
Step 2: Collect the data
Step 3: Plot the data
Step 4: Calculate the control limits
The first step in constructing a control chart is to identify one key
measure you want to track over time or against some base other than
time. This measure should be a “quality/productivity” (external
customer or internal process) indicator providing information useful
in making decisions.
Possible measures include:
- Volume (i.e., how much over a specified period of time)
- Cycle time (i.e., how long something takes)
- Errors and defects (i.e., how many are incorrect over a period of
time)
- Waste (i.e., how much is reworked or rejected)
The following example illustrates how you can use the Control Chart
in a service-related situation.
A major hotel in large metropolitan area…recently embarked on
a quality-improvement effort. Steve, the new Quality Manager, discovered
through a customer survey that the billing process was rated “high”
in importance and received the most complaints. He decided to collect
data on the number and types of errors to determine if the billing process
was “in control” (i.e., its variation was due to day-to-day
or common causes of variation) and to see where improvements could be
made. Steve decided to use P-chart, which would help him identify the
percentage of billing statements that contained errors….
Step 2: Collect The Data
Collect data then calculate the percent defective in the space provided.
Items to be included on your data collection form include, but are not
limited to:
- date;
- number inspected;
- number defective;
- types of defects/errors; and
- percent defective.
Some tips that will help you collect data include:
- Use a sample containing at least 50 items (the sample should be
big enough to give an average of three or more defects per sample)
- Avoid taking samples over long periods of time (i.e., try to break
large samples up into more manageable two or four-hour time periods
versus sampling full 24-hour day)
- Avoid varying sample sizes
- Take a minimum of 20 sets of samples
The billing department…had completed basic statistics training,
so it wasn’t difficult for Steve to find volunteers eager to test
their newly acquired skills. Michelle, a billing analyst, offered to
inspect 50 hotel bills on a daily basis to find out how many times there
were problems with customers’ bills (the number one customer complaint).
Steve asked her to use the data collection form to keep track of the
information that would be used to determine the state of the billing
process…(See Diagram 1)
Creating a control chart consists of four major steps:
Step 1: Determine what to measure
Step 2: Collect the data
Step 3: Plot the data
Step 4: Calculate the control limits
Step 1: Determine what to measure
The first step in constructing a control chart is to identify one key
measure you want to track over time or against some base other than
time. This measure should be a “quality/productivity” (external
customer or internal process) indicator providing information useful
in making decisions.
Possible measures include:
- Volume, e.g., how much over a specified period of time
- Cycle time, e.g., how long something takes
- Errors and defects, e.g., how many are incorrect over
a period of time
- Waste, e.g., how much is reworked or rejected
The example below illustrates how you can use the control chart in
a service-related situation.
| A major hotel in a large metropolitan
area recently embarked on a quality-improvement effort.
Steve, the new Quality Manager, discovered through a customer
survey that the billing process was rated “high” in
importance and received the most complaints. He decided to collect
data on the number and types of errors to determine if the billing
process was “in control” (i.e., its variation was
due to day-to-day or common causes of variation) and to see where
improvements could be made. Steve decided to use P-chart, which
would help him identify the percentage of billing statements that
contained errors. |
Step 2: Collect the data
Collect data then calculate the percent defective in the space provided.
Items to be included on your data collection form include, but are not
limited to:
- date
- number inspected
- number defective
- types of defects/errors
- percent defective
Some tips that will help you collect data include:
- Use a sample containing at least 50 items, i.e., the sample
should be big enough to give an average of three or more defects per
sample
- Avoid taking samples over long periods of time, i.e., try
to break large samples up into more manageable two or four-hour time
periods versus sampling full 24-hour day
- Avoid varying sample sizes.
- Take a minimum of 20 sets of samples.
| The billing department had completed
basic statistics training, so it wasn’t difficult for Steve
to find volunteers eager to test their newly acquired skills.
Michelle, a billing analyst, offered to inspect 50 hotel bills
on a daily basis to find out how many times there were problems
with customers’ bills (the number one customer complaint).
Steve asked her to use the data collection form to keep track
of the information that would be used to determine the state of
the billing process…(See Diagram 1 below.) |
Diagram 1 – Sample Control chart data collection
sheet
(3.5 recorded on 7-22, not a consensus on whether one was a real defect;
count .5)
| |
|
|
Types of Defects |
|
Remarks |
Date |
No. of
inspected |
Wrong
Room |
Wrong
Name |
Wrong
Address |
Incomplete
Information |
% Defective |
| |
7-14 |
50 |
8 |
1 |
1 |
|
20 |
| |
7-15 |
50 |
13 |
|
|
1 |
28 |
| |
7-16 |
50 |
11 |
|
1 |
|
24 |
| |
7-17 |
50 |
10 |
3 |
1 |
1 |
30 |
| |
7-18 |
50 |
12 |
|
1 |
1 |
28 |
| |
7-21 |
50 |
14 |
1 |
|
|
30 |
| |
7-22 |
50 |
3.5 |
1 |
2 |
1 |
15 |
| |
7-23 |
50 |
13 |
7 |
2 |
2 |
48 |
| |
2-24 |
50 |
9 |
|
1 |
1 |
22 |
Step 3: Plot the data
After you’ve taken at least 20 samples and calculated the percent
defective for each, create the plotting scale on the vertical axis of
the graph. The scale should reveal whatever is appropriate for your
particular measurement. Create a horizontal axis with a point for each
sample date.
Plot the individual percent defectives on the graph. Next, compute
the average percent defective by adding all of the percent defectives
for the individual samples and dividing the result by total number of
samples taken (in this case 20). Draw a horizontal line at the appropriate
value, and label it (
=).
| Michelle began the workday by
spending 15 minutes checking the bills for room number errors,
as well as address errors, name errors, and incomplete information.
She also calculated the percentage of bills that were defective
for 20 working days. She then plotted the individual percentages,
connected the line, and calculated the average percent defective,
or
(View
Diagram 2). |
Step 4: Calculate the control limits
Control limits will tell you if your process is in statistical control
(i.e., the process is exhibiting only common cause variation, or the
usual amount of day-to-day variation you might expect from common reasons,
such as slightly different materials, methods, machines etc.). Think
of control limits as invisible boundary lines. As long as the data points
are within the boundary lines, everything is “OK.” However,
when data points are outside the boundary, alarms should go off, and
you’ll need to investigate why the boundary has been crossed.
Control limits are calculated by using the following formula:
| Having plotted all the data points
Michelle calculated the upper and lower control limits for the
billing process (View
Diagram 3) where:
UCLP
= Upper Control Limit
LCLP
= Lower Control Limit
= Square Root
n = Sample Size
P = Average
Percent Defective
She found the corresponding points on the vertical axis of the
graph and drew the horizontal lines above and below the average
line. She labeled them with the upper and lower control limit
values. (View
Diagram 4). |
Follow-up: Decide On Next Steps
What you do next depends upon whether or not your points are within
the control limits.
If all points are within the control limits:
- Continue with no changes
- Recreate the P-chart periodically to double-check process control
- Make improvements to the process to reduce common variations
- Review to ensure any changes have had a positive effect
If one or more points are outside the control limits:
- Investigate and take steps to eliminate the cause(s)
- Review to ensure changes have had a positive effect, i.e.,
uncommon causes have been eliminated
- Take new samples, and create a new P-chart using limits based on
the new information
| Having found the billing process to be
out of control, i.e., one or more points outside
the control limits; (View
Diagram 5), Michelle and two other billing analysts began
an investigation into the causes. They knew process improvements
could not take place until all special causes, those which caused
the data to be outside the control limits, had been identified
and eliminated. From recent training, they knew special causes
could be assigned to several main categories, including:
- Equipment
- Materials
- Methods, i.e., not having a consistent method for
the process
- People, e.g., not having the necessary training,
etc.
- Environment, i.e., literally: a heat wave, earthquake,
etc., or new management, company direction, etc.
They also knew the investigation process wouldn’t be easy
but were confident real improvements could be made after the process
was “in control.” The next challenge would be reducing
the average defect rate substantially, from 27.22% to less than
5%, within six months. With the right problem solving and quality
improvement tools, they felt they could accomplish their goal.
|
In summary, use the control chart when:
- Trying to determine if a process is in statistical control, i.e.,
a process is said to be “out of control” when a data points
falls outside of the control limits
- You and your team want to create a visual representation of process
performance. Like the run chart, the control chart provides a picture
of process performance that can be used as a process-tracking device.
- You and your team want to distinguish between a special cause variation
- a clear occurrence of something not normally part of the process,
and a common cause variation - coincidental changes that are inherent
in the process
- You and your team know the process will not change while you are
collecting data. The process must not be changed because the intent
is to see how the process performs “naturally."
More
Quality Tools